Applicant applies for a position with Ace Corporation. During the interview, Ace suspects that the applicant is gay. When asked why the suspicion, Ace says that the male applicant acted effeminately. Ace decides not to hire the applicant, who is otherwise qualified. Does the applicant have a cause of action against Ace? [ Jantz v. Muci, 759 F. Supp. 1543 (D. Kan. 1991).]
Power Point Presentation
August 7, 2017Art and Technique of Filmmaking
August 7, 2017Applicant applies for a position with Ace Corporation. During the interview, Ace suspects that the applicant is gay. When asked why the suspicion, Ace says that the male applicant acted effeminately. Ace decides not to hire the applicant, who is otherwise qualified. Does the applicant have a cause of action against Ace? [ Jantz v. Muci, 759 F. Supp. 1543 (D. Kan. 1991).]
Applicant applies for a position with Ace Corporation. During the interview, Ace suspects that the applicant is gay. When asked why the suspicion, Ace says that the male applicant acted effeminately. Ace decides not to hire the applicant, who is otherwise qualified. Does the applicant have a cause of action against Ace? [ Jantz v. Muci, 759 F. Supp. 1543 (D. Kan. 1991).]
