| MSITM 6320 AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT – RESEARCH ARTICLE REVIEW RUBRIC |
| SNO |
Criteria |
Weight |
Score |
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Below Proficient |
| 1 |
Content ofReview |
40% |
|
In depth analysis of the content (all major points discussed). Excellent summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with a high degree of clarity and insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, both indicate the overall focus of the paper Points : 40 |
Comprehensive analysis of the content (most of the major points discussed). Adequate summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with considerable clarity, but lacks insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, paper focus inconsistently supported. Points : 34 |
Minimal analysis of the content (some of the major points discussed). Basic summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with little clarity or insight. Introduction and conclusion do not indicate the overall focus of the paper. Points : 28 |
No content (missed all major points of the content). Incomplete summary. Key ideas/themes/findings are not communicated clearly and/or missed in analysis. There is no clear introduction or conclusion Points : 24 |
| 2 |
Reflection |
30% |
|
Demonstrates thorough understanding of the article by listing all key findings and reflecting upon their implications. Points : 30 |
Demonstrates considerable understanding of the article by listing all of the key findings. Points : 25 |
Demonstrates some understanding of the article by listing some of the key findings…but documentation is lacking in completeness. Points : 21 |
Demonstrates little understanding of the article with few or no key findings reported. Points: 18 |
| 3 |
Organization & Development of Ideas |
15% |
|
Logical development of ideas through welldeveloped paragraphs, good use of transitions. Points : 15 |
Logical organization, paragraph development not perfected. Points : 12 |
Logical organization, paragraphs not fully developed. Points : 10 |
No evidence of structure or organization. Points: 08 |
| 4 |
Mechanics |
15% |
|
Meets length requirement. 1-2 grammatical errors. 1-2 punctuation errors. APA 7 Guidelines are meticulously followed. Adheres to Font/Spacing Guidelines. Points : 15 |
Length requirement is met with adequate content 3-4 grammatical errors. 3-4 punctuation errors. Adheres consistently to APA 7 guidelines, however, one error present. Adheres to either Font or Spacing Guidelines, but not both. Points : 12 |
Length requirement is not met; minimal content 5-6 grammatical errors 5-6 punctuation errors Demonstrates little ability to adhere to APA 7 guidelines, more than two errors present Adheres to neither Font nor Spacing Guidelines Points : 10 |
Length requirement is not met; poor content Numerous grammatical errors (distracting) Numerous punctuation errors APA 7 format is not used Does not adhere to Font/Spacing Guidelines. Points : 08 |
|
TOTAL |
100% |
|
|
|
|
