MGT672
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 9
Exceeds Expectation |
Meets Expectation |
Below Expectation |
Limited Evidence |
|
Content, Research, and Analysis |
||||
21-25 Points |
16-20 Points |
11-15 Points |
6-10 Points |
|
Requirements |
Exceeds Expectation -Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
Meets Expectation – Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
Below Expectation – Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
Limited Evidence – Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
21-25 Points |
16-20 Points |
11-15 Points |
6-10 Points |
|
Content |
Exceeds Expectation – Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions. |
Meets Expectation – Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions. |
Below Expectation – Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions. |
Limited Evidence – Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions. |
25-30 Points |
19-24 Points |
13-18 Points |
7-12 Points |
|
Analysis |
Exceeds Expectation – Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of the benefits/challenges of expansion, as well as other concepts and applications. |
Meets Expectation – Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of the benefits/challenges of expansion, as well as other concepts and applications. |
Below Expectation – Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of the benefits/challenges of expansion, as well as other concepts and applications. |
Limited Evidence – Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of the benefits/challenges of expansion, as well as other concepts and applications. |
13-15 Points |
10-12 Points |
7-9 Points |
4-6 Points |
|
Sources |
Exceeds Expectation – Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. |
Meets Expectation – Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. |
Below Expectation – Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. |
Limited Evidence – Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. |