Consider the following case: Dr. M will be teaching a philosophy class at Morehouse next semester. M plans to teach a paper by Dr. Q, a philosopher of time whose work is widely known and well-respected by other academic philosophers; however, there is a persistent rumor that Q once used a racial epithet to refer to a colleague as part of a joke, which has led some philosophers to avoid interacting with him. The paper of Qs that M plans to teach is on the philosophy of time travel and, so far as M can tell, cannot be construed as racist in its content. At a conference, M and Q meet, and M mentions that she plans to teach a paper of Qs in her course next semester. Q says that, if asked, he would be happy to come to Morehouse to give a lecture about the topic of his paper to Morehouse students. Give a utilitarian argument about what M should do in this case. You may focus your argument on the comparison of just one pleasure and one pain that would come from M inviting Q to speak at Morehouse, but they should be reasonable.