Table 2. Policy Analysis Table
Criteria Public Health Impact Feasibility Economic and Budgetary Impact
Scoring Definitions
Low: small reach, effect size, and impact on disparate populations Medium: small reach with large effect size or large reach with small effect size High: large reach, effect size, and impact on disparate populations
Low: No/small likelihood of being enacted Medium: Moderate likelihood of being enacted High: High likelihood of being enacted
Less favorable: High costs to implement Favorable: Moderate costs to implement More favorable: Low costs to implement
Less favorable: costs are high relative to benefits Favorable: costs are moderate relative to benefits (benefits justify costs) More favorable: costs are low relative to benefits
Policy 1 ____________
Low
Medium
High Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No)
Low
Medium
High Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No)
Budget Less favorable
Favorable
More favorable Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No)
Economic Less favorable
Favorable
More favorable Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No)
Policy 2 ____________
Low
Medium
High Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No)
Low
Medium
High Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No)
Less favorable
Favorable
More favorable Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No)
Less favorable
Favorable
More favorable Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No)
Policy 3 ____________
Low
Medium
High Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No)
Low
Medium
High Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No)
Less favorable
Favorable
More favorable Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No)
Less favorable
Favorable
More favorable Concerns about the amount or quality of data? (Yes / No)
NOTE: Scoring is subjective and this table is intended to be used as an organizational guide.