You will need to explain several matters here: explain how the HRA is supposed to protect rights in the UK; why it might be said that the Act has been the victim of a campaign of misinformation; why it might be thought repealing the Act is a ˜vote winner’ You will also need to undertake some critical analysis here “ to deal with the value judgment Grosz is making here “ he clearly believes the HRA should remain a part of British law. Why does he think this? What do you think?