Write a five-to-eight page assessment of your team’s project (presentation for prospective Graduate students).
How will the second site factor into domain controller placement? How will AD sites be configured?
August 4, 2017Prepare an 11- to 15-page paper (not including the title and reference pages) that assesses a legal/ethical issue or situation relating to a current, previous, or potential future work environment.
August 4, 2017Write a five-to-eight page assessment of your team’s project (presentation for prospective Graduate students).
Write a five-to-eight page assessment of your team’s project (presentation for prospective Graduate students).
Must include
Introduction and conclusion
Planning,
Climate of motivation
Decision making
Communication
Special attention will be given to the balance between planning the task and motivating the people and the use of the Six Thinking Hats approach. Grades will be based on the accurate use of multiple concepts from the session’s readings to analyze the team’s success.
Include introduction and conclusion
1. Team meant weekly
2. Each member of the team was highly motivated
3. Each team member was part of the decision main
4. Communication was open between team members
Reference
debonair, E. (1999). Six Thinking Hats. Boston: Micro Management Resources
Harvard Business Review. (2012). HBRGuide to Project Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing. ISBN 978-1422187296
Amiable, T. and Kramer, S. (2011). The Progress Principle: Using Small Wins to Ignite Joy, Engagement, and Creativity at Work. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing. ISBN 978-1422198575
Seem, M. (2006). The GO Point. New York: Crown Business. ISBN: 978-1400082995
SWOT Analysis http://www.mindtools.com/community/pages/article/newTMC_05_1.php
Project Management Skills Quiz http://www.mindtools.com/community/pages/article/newPPM_60.php
Stakeholder Analysis http://www.mindtools.com/community/pages/article/worksheets/PowerInterestGridDownload.php
Goal Setting (MOB) http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMM_94.htm
Work Breakdown Schedule and Gantlet Chart for Small Projects http://www.mindtools.com/community/Bite-SizedTraining/BiteSizedTraining-SmallProjects.pdf
Star Bursting Model http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newCT_91.htm
Flow http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/flow-model.htm
Kenmore-Foregoes Decision Template http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_94.htm
OM 580 Individual Team Assessment Rubric
(98 points possible per assignment)
| Poor (0 points) | Fair (7 points) | Good (11 points) | Excellent (14 points) | |
| Content | Does not follow assignment directions | Minimally follows some of assignment instructions | Adequately follows most of assignment instructions | Fully and completely follows assignment directions |
| Assessment of Team Project Planning | Does not provide an assessment of team project planning | Provides a minimal assessment of team project planning | Provides an adequate assessment of team project planning | Provides a fully developed assessment of team project planning |
| Assessment of Climate of Motivation | Does not provide an assessment of the team’s climate of motivation | Provides a minimal assessment of the team’s climate of motivation | Provides an adequate assessment of the team’s climate of motivation | Provides a fully developed assessment of the team’s climate of motivation |
| Assessment of Team Decision Making | Does not provide an assessment of the team’s decision making | Provides a minimal assessment of the team’s decision making | Provides an adequate assessment of the team’s decision making | Provides a fully developed assessment of the team’s decision making |
| Assessment of Team Communication | Does not provide an assessment of the team’s communication | Provides a minimal assessment of the team’s communication | Provides an adequate assessment of the team’s communication | Provides a fully developed assessment of the team’s communication |
| Summary Assessment | Does not provide for a graduate-?level scholarly analysis; no integration between theory and practice is evident; no reference to literature | Minimally provides for a graduate-?level scholarly analysis; discussion is superficial in nature; no reference to literature | Adequately provides for a scholarly analysis; discussion and presentation approach the graduate-?level in nature; minimal reference to scholarly literature | Fully provides for a scholarly analysis at the expected graduate-?level; multiple references to scholarly literature and class discussions; full integration between theory and practice is evident |
| Scholarly writing | Does not follow SPA format; multiple errors in writing, grammar, and style detract from the presentation | Minimally follows SPA format;several errors in
writing, grammar, and style that detract from the presentation |
Mostly follows SPA format;Some errors in
writing, grammar, and style that overall do not detract from the presentation |
Fully and completely follows SPA
format; very few errors in writing, grammar, and style; scholarly writing is at the expected Graduate-?level. |
