| |
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
|
4
Good
85.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
|
| 70.0 %
Content
|
|
| 35.0 %
Consideration of Legal Rights and Responsibilities of All Stakeholders
|
No consideration of legal rights and responsibilities of all stakeholders is present. |
Consideration of legal rights and responsibilities of all stakeholders is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. |
Consideration of legal rights and responsibilities of all stakeholders is complete, but is somewhat inaccurate or irrelevant. Research is inadequate in relevance, quality, or consists of sources that are not current. |
Consideration of legal rights and responsibilities of all stakeholders is accurate. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
Consideration of legal rights and responsibilities of all stakeholders is comprehensive, accurate, and clearly provides purpose and facts. Research is thorough, current, and relevant. All issues stated in the assignment criteria are thoroughly addressed. |
|
| 35.0 %
Contextual Background Explaining the Need for a Social Media Policy Statement
|
No contextual background explaining the need for a social media policy statement is present. |
Contextual background explaining the need for a social media policy statement is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. |
Contextual background explaining the need for a social media policy statement is complete, but is somewhat inaccurate or irrelevant. Research is inadequate in relevance, quality, or consists of sources that are not current. |
Contextual background explaining the need for a social media policy statement is accurate. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
Contextual background explaining the need for a social media policy statement is comprehensive, accurate, and clearly provides purpose and facts. Research is thorough, current, and relevant. All issues stated in the assignment criteria are thoroughly addressed. |
|
| 20.0 %
Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
| 7.0 %
Thesis Development and Purpose
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
| 20.0 %
Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
| 8.0 %
Argument Logic and Construction
|
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
| 20.0 %
Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
| 5.0 %
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
Rules of grammar, usage, punctuation are followed. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
| 10.0 %
Format
|
|
| 5.0 %
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
| 10.0 %
Format
|
|
| 5.0 %
Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. |
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. |
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. |
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
|
| 100 %
Total Weightage
|
|
