Hypertension, Pediatrics” case scenario

The rule in Salomon v Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 has been described as one of the corner stones of English Company Law. Discuss the rationale and impact of the decision on company law.
August 3, 2017
Transition into Professional Practice
August 3, 2017
Show all

Hypertension, Pediatrics” case scenario

Hypertension, Pediatrics” case scenario

Read the “Hypertension, Pediatrics” case scenario found on page 199 in your course textbook. Based on the scenario, imagine that you are a researcher involved with this study. Then, compose a mock journal submission paper based on the scenario. Please include the following sections: (1) Introduction; (2) Methods; (3) Results; and (4) Discussion. You do not need to include an abstract for this assignment. Your Assignment should be 3 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages.

Grading rubric Description:

Total Possible Score: 7.00
Calculations for assigned problems (6.56, 6.57, 6.58)
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Calculations are all successful and all inclusive. Calculations are presented clearly and succinctly to comprehensively evaluate results.
Proficient – Calculations are mostly all successful and adequately comprehensive to further evaluate results.
Basic – Calculations are partially successful, but may only represent a segment of the calculations required to comprehensively evaluate results.
Below Expectations – Attempts to provide calculations. They do not represent the calculations required to comprehensively evaluate results.
Non-Performance – The calculations for problems 6.56, 6.57, and 6.58 are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Mock Journal
Total: 3.50
Distinguished – Provides a mock journal with the introduction, methods, results, and discussion. Each section contains exceptional detail.
Proficient – Provides a mock journal with the introduction, methods, results, and discussion. Each section contains some detail, but relevant information may be missing.
Basic -Provides a minimal mock journal with the introduction, methods, results, and discussion. One or more of the sections may be missing many relevant details.
Below Expectations – Attempts to provide a mock journal with the introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections. Information is incomplete and/or inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The mock journal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Critical Thinking: Evidence
Total: 0.40
Distinguished – Employs persuasive information from credible source(s) to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.
Proficient – Employs applicable information from credible source(s) to develop an analysis of the topic.
Basic – Identifies applicable information from credible source(s), but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.
Below Expectations – Displays information from external source(s), but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.
Non-Performance -The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Quantitative Literacy: Communication
Total: 0.40
Distinguished – Uses quantitative information in association with the argument or purpose of the work, presents it in an effective format, and explains it with consistently high caliber.
Proficient -Uses quantitative information in association with the argument or purpose of the work, though data is presented in a less than completely effective format or some parts of the explanation may be uneven.
Basic -Uses quantitative information, but does not effectively associate it to the argument or purpose of the work.
Below Expectations – Attempts to present an argument for which quantitative evidence would be pertinent but does not provide adequate explicit numerical support.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.19
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
Proficient -Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations -Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

APA Formatting
Total: 0.17
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title and reference page.
Proficient -Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Page Requirement
Total: 0.17
Distinguished – The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.
Proficient – The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.
Basic – The paper meets over half of the page requirement.
Below Expectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Resource Requirement
Total: 0.17
Distinguished -Provides ample resources and uses the correct number of sources from the specified search agents.
Proficient – Provides the approximate number of sources, while using some of the correct search agents specified in the assignment instructions.
Basic – Provides over half of the sources required in the assignment instructions.
Below Expectations – Provides inadequate number of resources and does not include sources from specified search agents.
Non-Performance -The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instruction
ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *