Functionalism, conflict theory, symbolic interactionism or utilitarianism
Many convictions have been overturned because DNA or other evidence indicates that eye-witnesses who were absolutely certain that they saw and identified someone could not have been correct. Where does this leave us with regard to confidence in our visual perception, not only with regard to eye-witness testimony, but in life in general? Can we never trust our own eyes, ears, etc.?
August 3, 2017Poem Analysis-”Morning in the Burned House” by Margaret Atwood,
August 3, 2017
Functionalism, conflict theory, symbolic interactionism or utilitarianism
Paper instructions:
In your original post: Using at least 2 sociological concepts and evidence from this week’s lectures (including audio clip) and/or your Barkan, or Gladwell readings (underline concepts and reference evidence), argue for or against the following statement:
“The United States is a land of opportunity where any individual with talent and hard work can achieve upward mobility.”
Include also, the theoretical perspective (functionalism, conflict theory, symbolic interactionism or utilitarianism) you feel you are arguing from and why this theory reflects your point of view.
