The student will respond to the question from the professor in a 250 words minimum post. The student will use at least one outside source when responding to the discussion question from the professor. The student must show in-text citations and references at the bottom of their post. The student will also respond to at least two of their colleagues on both of these discussion boards. Quality of work, coverage of the subject, proper punctuation, and APA is also the focus on this grading assignment.

According to your text in Chapter 5, Carr believed that using unethical or ambiguous tactics was a part of the game. He mentions bluffing, exaggeration, and concealment of information are legitimate ways for individuals and corporations to maximize their self-interest. Based on ethics, what is your thoughts regarding this? Is it a misrepresentation of information?