Answer the following questions with a thorough discussion of the legal issue(s) presented, the rule(s) that applies(y), and the reasons for your conclusion(s). 
If there are facts that bear on your conclusion that are not available in the facts presented, assume all possible variations and trace the consequences of each assumption. Use the IRAC analysis. I have uploaded a sample file named “sample” that has the IRAC analysis structure. Be sure to analyze the Fact Set it will help with answering the questions.

1. Was      Megacorp justified in refusing delivery of the system on December 1st?

2. Microdev      claims it lost a contract for $750,000 because of Jim’s defamation of      Bill. Was the judge correct in awarding Bill only $1.00? Why or why not?CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS ESSAY!!!!