Access to Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) should be covered by Medicare in Australia. OR?. Access to Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) should not be covered by Medicare in Australia
Access to Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) should be covered by Medicare in Australia. OR?. Access to Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) should not be covered by Medicare in Australia

This is a position paper which follows the format:
Introduction
-What are both arguments and counter arguments?
– What is your thesis statement? Eg. This paper will argue…

Argument 1
– Definition
– Who says this (peer reviewed reference)
– What, how and why this backs up your central claim

Argument 2
– Definition
– Who says this (peer reviewed reference)
– What, how and why this backs up your central claim

Counter Argument 1
– Counters Argument 1 (above)
– Definition
– Who says this (peer reviewed reference)
– What, how and why this challenges your central claim in argument 1

Counter Argument 2
– Counters Argument 2 (above)
– Definition
– Who says this (peer reviewed reference)
– What, how and why this challenges your central claim in argument 1

Reply
– How do we get rid of the two problems posed in the counter arguments

Conclusion

Referencing
Can only use one website, and all journals need to be peer reviewed
Style and referencing guide attached

The paper must refer to relevant philosophy issues:
– Autonomy ?Notions of ‘personhood’?
– Deontology (Duty – Immanual Kant (classic deontological) & Obligation)

The rubric marks each argument and counter argument individually.