Industry Analysis Report & Oral Presentation
In groups of Two, you are asked to conduct an Industry Analysis for one of the following Industries; Clothing retailing, Prepared meals production or Sugar manufacturing
The written report and oral presentation are part of the one Assessment.
You will also find further explanation regarding the report requirements in the power point presentation in BlackBoard. There is also a report template available on BlackBoard and it is recommended that you use this when writing the report.
It is highly recommended that you make yourself familiar with both the report requirements and the marking guide.
Due: Week 5 (Date and time will be confirmed later by the Convenor)
Worth: 40% Total (Report 30% & Oral presentation 10%)
Team: 2 members per group
It is expected that the hard copy of the report will be bound and include a front and back cover. Do ensure that all Appendices have been included before binding. Binding gives a Professional polished look to your group report.
Details of the Report
You are asked to analyse an Industry (which will be provided to you within the teaching period).
Your analysis needs to include the following:
Part A: Industry Analysis
Part B: Environmental Analysis
Critically evaluate and discuss two (2) environmental factors that have impacted this industry from 1st December 2014 to date. Describe environmental factors that are currently affecting the Australian market or likely to affect it in the near future. You will need to provide evidence attached to the Appendices that support your discussion. This evidence will be printouts of actual Newspaper or Journal articles that can be sourced from one of the databases available through the Swinburne library. e.g. Proquest, Factiva, Ebscohost etc. Your teacher may run through access details to these databases within a Lab session. Please remember to correctly acknowledge sources of information for each article included.
The environmental factors should be a combination of both micro and macro environmental factors.
Part C: Secondary Data Analysis
Select at least three different types of sources of Secondary data collected for this report and evaluate each in terms of its relevance, accuracy, currency and impartiality.
Part D: Marketing Mix
You are asked to select one brand or product within the Industry being discussed and provide an overview of the Marketing Mix. You will include a description for the Product, Price, Promotion and Place for this brand or product. Your discussion should include at least one to two paragraph description for each of the 4Ps.
Research & Referencing:
To complete this task successfully, students need to engage in extensive research.
Sources such as journal articles, websites, industry magazines and newspaper articles will be relevant to gather information.
You will be asked to provide a Reference List (not a bibliography)
In-text referencing:
You MUST have a minimum of 8 references which include academic and newspapers. If you have not referenced your information correctly, your overall grade will be affected for this assessment.
Word Limit: 3500 words (excluding Executive Summary & the Reference list)
Format:
This document MUST follow the structure of a formal report. Students have been provided with a Report Template which is available on BlackBoard and this shows how to correctly lay out the report. To access the Template, please login to the unit in Blackboard.
Located on the left hand side of the screen, select Analysis Report and then Report Template. There are also PowerPoint slides that provide further description for each section.
(You can also refer the Communications Skills Handbook for additional information on how to correctly write a Business Report).
Grammar and written report:
It is expected that the report will be prepared and presented in a professional manner. Grammar and spelling will be assessed in this report.
A copy of the report MUST be uploaded on Blackboard and the hard copy submitted to the teacher by the due date & time specified by the convenor
If the Turnitin copy (from Blackboard) is not uploaded a 10% penalty maybe applicable.
The report is marked out of 60 and scaled back to a mark out of 30.
RATIONALE for the Assignment
This assignment will help you develop the following skills in addition to learning the relevant marketing concept topics:
You will develop skills such as logical thinking, gathering and analysing information, verbally and visually articulating this information.
Oral Presentation
Due: Week 6 (Date and time will be confirmed later by the Convenor)
Worth: 10%
Team: 2 members per group (same group as per the report)
Time: 10 minute presentation
Dress Code: Professional (the presentation will be conducted in a business scenario).
You will be doing this Oral Presentation in the same group as for the report.
The content for the presentation will come from the analysis report that you completed.
You are to summarise the important aspects of your report in this presentation.
You do not have to try and cover all areas from the report.
Each presentation will be awarded marks based on content, creativity of presentation and professionalism.
NOTE: If all members of a group do not contribute or actively participate equally as the other members of a group, then they may be marked separately from the other members.
Please note it is a professional courtesy that you are present for all group presentations. You must be present from the start of all presentations, please do not disrespect your fellow students, and arrive late. Penalty marks will be applied if your group is not present from the start of the class presentations.
RATIONALE for the Assignment
Communication / Team work skills the assignment requires you to work in groups of three members. In the real world, team work is unavoidable. As such learning to work harmoniously and effectively within a team of your peers is important.
This assignment will help you develop communication within the same and different knowledge levels and cultural backgrounds. It will also develop team work skills, such as dividing workloads, completing assigned tasks, collaborating information and presenting one final document as a team.
HOW TO WORK IN A GROUP
Group / Team work is an important aspect of working in any field. As such this assignment will give you an opportunity to learn and develop some skills in this area
GROUP PROBLEMS
Group Problems?
Group work is a necessary part of marketing. However, there are occasions when some members do not take their responsibilities towards the group and task seriously. In the event this occurs, please follow the following steps:
The teacher and convenor will review this situation and in the event agree with the group, the non-participating group member may be assessed separately.
Analysis Report Marking Guide
Criteria | Weight | Not Satisfactory (Fail) | Pass | Credit | Distinction | High Distinction | |
Executive Summary | 2.5 | More of an introduction. Does not summarise the key content of the report.
Section not included. |
A sound summary of the reports major purpose and key content of the report. | A good summary of the reports major purpose and key content within the report | A very good summary of the reports major purpose, the benefits and analytical processes and the findings. | Concise and succinctly provides the major purpose of the report, the benefits and analytical processes and the findings. | |
Industry analysis | 20 | A minimal attempt. Extremely limited discussion of the market background, size and growth. Superficial analysis of competitors. Little sign of analysis
Section not included. |
A sound attempt at discussion and evaluating the overall industry. Some of the important time lines were highlighted. Sound discussion of the market background, market size, growth and Major competitors. Information supported by good sources | A good attempt at discussion and evaluating the overall industry. Important time lines were highlighted. Good discussion of the market background, market size and growth. A good analysis of the Major competitors. Information supported by good sources | A very good attempt at discussion and evaluating the overall industry. Important time lines were highlighted. Very Good discussion of the market background, market size and growth. A very good analysis of the Major competitors. Information supported by good sources | The industry and market are very clearly explained. An excellent discussion of the major events which shaped the industry and its evolution. Market size, growth and key competitors are very well described. Well researched and supported with in-text references.
An excellent evaluation of the industry is provided. |
|
Environmental factors | 10 | Discussion was descriptive and theoretical. Minimal research has been undertaken.
Section not included. Newspaper/ Journal articles not included in the Appendices |
Demonstrates a sound understanding of how any two environmental factors impacted the industry. Information supported by reasonable sources
Some Newspaper/ Journal articles included in the Appendices |
A good attempt at discussion and evaluating two environmental factors influencing the industry. Demonstrates a good understanding of how the factors impacted the industry. Information supported by good sources
Some Newspaper/Journal articles included in the Appendices |
A very good attempt at discussion and evaluating two environmental factors influencing the industry. Demonstrates a very good understanding of how the factors impacted the industry. Information supported by good sources
Newspaper/Journal articles included in the Appendices |
Discussion demonstrates in-depth knowledge, study, exploration and synthesis of information for each of the two factors. Well researched and supported. Cited evidence.
Newspaper/ Journal articles included in the Appendices |
|
Secondary Data Analysis | 5 | Weak analysis of Secondary Data
Section not included |
A sound analysis of Secondary data using some of the criteria of relevance currency, impartiality and accuracy | A good analysis of Secondary Data using the criteria of relevance currency, impartiality and accuracy | Very good analysis of Secondary Data using the criteria of relevance currency, impartiality and accuracy | Excellent analysis of Secondary Data using the criteria of relevance currency, impartiality and accuracy | |
Marketing Strategy | 10 | The discussion does not include a description for each of the 4Ps: Product, Price, Promotion, Place
Section not included |
A sound description for each of the 4Ps; Product, Price, Promotion, Place
|
Good description for each of the 4Ps; Product, Price, Promotion, Place | Very good description for each of the 4Ps; ; Product, Price, Place, Promotion | Excellent description for each of the 4Ps; Product, Price, Promotion, Place | |
Conclusion | 2.5 | Introduces new information. Weak conclusion.
Section not included. |
A sound attempt to summarise the main points/findings of the report. | A good attempt to summarise the main points/findings of the report. Satisfactory finishing argument to the report | A very good attempt to summarise the main points/findings of the report. A good finishing argument to the report. | Section summarises the main points/findings effectively. Does not introduce new information. Strong finish to the document. | |
Research &Referencing | 5 | Insufficient references used. Sources are not credible. Information not reference adequately. Over use of quotes. Incorrect referencing style.
Reference list not included |
Sufficient references used (5-8 academic/industry sources). Some attempt to paraphrase and use in-text referencing.
Reference List included many inaccuracies. Does not follow the Harvard approach. |
Sufficient references used (5-8 academic/industry sources). Mostly well paraphrased and citied. Reference list included with an attempt evident to follow the Harvard Style Guide. A few inaccuracies in the Reference List | Sufficient references used (5-8 academic/industry sources). Well paraphrased and citied. Good referencing style throughout the report. Reference List included with most References correctly listed according to the Harvard Style Guide. | Excellent range of sources used both industry and theory (more than 8). Sources consistently referenced to support discussion. Reference list correctly presented of all the sources. Excellent reference style throughout the report using the Harvard approach. | |
|
5 | Casual/ informal/personal language used. Report written in the first person. Quotes instead of paraphrasing information. Poor grammar and spelling. Over the word limit Numerous grammatical and spelling errors. | Report written in the third person. Several spelling/ grammatical errors. Not Within word limit | Good sentence structure with only a few spelling/ grammar errors. Within word limit. A good An attempt has been made to ensure that Vocabulary and sentence construction are appropriate to a professional document. | Very good sentence structure. Grammar and spelling very good. Good use of word count. Vocabulary and sentence construction nearing a professional document standard. | Excellent sentence structure, grammar and no spelling mistakes. Very good use of word count. Vocabulary and sentence construction consistent to a professional document. Grammar and spelling exceptional. | |
TOTALS | 60 | ||||||
General Comments:
Oral Presentation Marking Guide
Criteria | Weight | Not Done / Below standard | Pass | Credit | Distinction | High distinction |
Verbal &nonverbal communications | 4.0 | Speakers did not speak or were completely inaudible and made no eye contact | Speakers were fairly clear, however referred to the notes a little too much.
Fairly good engagement and good eye contact with the audience. |
Speakers were clear. Good modulation of voice. Minimal use of notes. Attempts to build rapport with the audience. | Exceptionally clear. Little reference to notes. Complete engagement with the audience. All the speakers are familiar with the total presentation. | Confident and professional speech.
Excellent eye contact with the audience. Outstanding presentation.
|
Power point slides (PPTs) creative | 1.5 | No PPTs or a very poor attempt has been made but it is below standard. | Fairly basic PPTs. Overcrowded or too little information. Minimal creativity. Basic organisation and compilation of PPTs. | Well organised and fairly good structure to the presentation. Good use of graphics and good attempt creativity. | Exceptionally well organised and very good structure. Very creative PPTs and good used of graphics | Professional PPTs. Excellent use of graphics. Outstanding, creative and original PPTs. |
Content delivered | 2.0 | Very poor link between report and PPTs. Below standard. | Content presented is basic and superficial. | Relevant and informed presentation. Satisfactory connection between report and PPTs | Very good selection of information from the report is presented. | Exceptional content and analysis. Excellent examples citied |
Professional appearance and time management | 2.5 | No effort/ dressed inappropriately. Timing -very poor. | Dressed casually- little effort towards appearance. Timing needs to improve. | Dressed smart/casual and timing was satisfactory. | Dress appropriately and timing was very good. | Professional attire and impeccable timing of the presentation. |
Total | 10 | Less than 5 | (5 to 5.9) | (6 to 7) | (7 to 7.9) | (8 to 10) |