In 250 words or less, present at least three critical responses to the readings assigned for 19 March. You do NOT have to summarize the readings.

Treatment for ADHD
August 4, 2017
What will be the role of supply chain collaborations in the corporate sustainable development?
August 4, 2017
Show all

In 250 words or less, present at least three critical responses to the readings assigned for 19 March. You do NOT have to summarize the readings.

In 250 words or less, present at least three critical responses to the readings assigned for 19 March. You do NOT have to summarize the readings.

You must discuss at least two of the assigned readings. You may refer to the readings by the author’s last name. In offering critical responses to the readings, be sure to respond to the author’s arguments, not the arguments of the people discussed by the author. Here is an example based on last week’s readings.

The essays by Nash, Perry, and Cabezas offer interesting and thought-provoking arguments about interracial heterosexualities in the United States, Canada, and the Caribbean, but they are problematic in four ways. First, the essays by Nash and Perry do not pay sufficient attention to the voices and perspectives of women of color; they focus instead on the meanings of interracial sex for dominant white culture. Women of color might have distinct reasons for supporting or opposing interracial sex, but Nash and Perry do not explore these reasons. Second, Nash’s conclusion offers a celebratory vision of multiculturalism that downplays the ongoing importance of ethnic and racial identities for people of color. In promoting cultural hybridity, Nash offers a sexualized version of the melting pot. Third, Nash often fails to distinguish between sexuality and marriage. For example, he refers to the frontier as a marrying ground (947), but what he really means is that it was a space where people from different cultures had sex. Turning to Cabezas, her essay makes claims about new and distinct sexual dynamics in the context of tourism in Cuba and the Dominican Republic, but it does so without examining the past, so we cannot know if the dynamics she discusses are new. The essay by Cabezas also does not compare these dynamics to sexual dynamics between Cubans and between Dominicans, so we cannot know how distinct these tourism-based relationships are.

I will also upload the course reading assingned for the paper as well .
I have download all the readings , also the pahes are mentioned in the attachment which is called 3601 course reading.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *