Discussion 1 Having read the quantitative article by Baronet, identify the theory that Baronet used to shape the study. Analyze how the author’s selection of the theory influenced the goal of the study, the research questions, the hypotheses, and the selection of the variables. At the end of the analysis, discuss the extent to which the theory is aligned with the research questions, hypotheses, and the selection of the variables and why you believe there is alignment or lack of alignment. the article for this paper will be downloaded: Thomas Kuhn(please follow instructions carefully) this project is important. Part 2 Please follow instruction Response Guidelines Respond to one peer. Using the Peer Discussion Feedback Form located in Resources, evaluate your peer’s performance in answering the discussion questions by completing the three criteria. In addition, constructively explain your rationale for the performance rating you selected. When you have completed this document, select all, copy, and paste the content into the reply you are posting to your peer. Please read then respond using the guidelines from above, also the peer feedback form will be downloaded Evaluating the Impact of Research (you are to give this paper a peer review feedback) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Perceived past, present, and future control and adjustment to stressful life events. 1. Does the study address something that is not known or has not been studied before€How is this study new or different from other studies? A great deal of research has suggested that the general belief that one has control over one’s own life is associated with greater well being. This particular research study differs because it assesses perceived control over different aspects of a specific event. The researchers developed a new measure of perceived past, present, and future control over stressful life events. The data supported the content validity, factor structure, internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and convergent and descriminant validity of the new measure. 2. How did the findings impact that field of interest: So what? Three hierarchical regression analyses were performed in which measures of general or event-specific distress were regressed on general control measures in Step 1 and the three control scales in Step 2. In all three analyses, present control explained additional variance in general and event-specific distress beyond that predicted by general control beliefs. In all instances, present control was associated with less distress. 3. What possible practical implications do the authors predict the results of their research will have? For instance, what will be the impact of these results on the sample, the site location, or the workplace: Who cares? The goal of this study was to advance the understanding of the role of perceived control in adjustment to stressful life events by developing a non-event-specific measure of perceived control that assesses past, present, and future control (Frazier et al., 2001) and using this measure to address theoretical questions about the relations between these dimensions of perceived control, adjustment, and related constructs.