media law memo

Project description

Pretend the Seuss V Penguin case is appealed to the Supreme court. You are a clerk for a Supreme court justice. Write a memo arguing that the decision should be reversed and defending why Penguin did not infringe on the copyright of Dr. Seuss. you must use the legal cases we have used in class and the legal doctrine to defend your arguments. this cannot be based on your own opinion but must be argues using the law.

state legal conclusion first

state existing law

how does law apply to facts of this case

legal conclusion

discuss any cases/laws that would contradict your findings

explain why they do not contradict your finding.